Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of literature for magnetic resonance imaging radiomics feature robustness

From: Robustness of radiomic features in magnetic resonance imaging: review and a phantom study

Reference

Disease / phantom

MR sequences

# features

Feature classes

Parameters evaluated

Statistical analysis

Robustness evaluation

Baessler et al. [26], 2019

Vegetable/fruit phantom

FLAIR, T1w, T2w

45

Intensity, shape, texture

MR sequence, resolution

CCC, DR, Bland-Altman analyses, ICC

Test-retest robustness, intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility

Traverso et al. [50], 2019

Locally advanced rectal cancer

DWI (ADC map)

70

Intensity, shape, texture

Pre-processing filter, re-binning and resampling

CCC, ICC, Spearman correlation

Inter-observer dependence

Duron et al. [39], 2019

Lacrymal gland tumor and breast lesion

T1w, DWI (ADC map), DIXON, DISCO

69/57 (2 softwares)

Texture

Discretization method, bin width and bin number

CCC, ICC(2,1)

Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility

Lecler et al. [37], 2019

Lacrimal gland tumor

T1w, DWI (ADC map), DIXON

85

Intensity, shape, texture

MR sequence, metric threshold

CCC, ICC(2,1), Spearman correlation

Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility, non-redundancy

Um et al. [51], 2019

Glioblastoma multiforme

FLAIR, T1w, post-contrast T1w

420

Intensity, shape, texture, filter-based

Preprocessing technique on multi-scanner datasets, bin number

Two-sided Wilcoxon tests

Feature variability

Schwier et al. [24], 2019

Prostate cancer

T2w, DWI (ADC map)

NA

Intensity, shape, texture, filter-based

Image normalization, 2D/3D texture computation, bin widths, and image pre-filtering

ICC(1,1)

Test-retest repeatability

Fiset et al. [38], 2019

Cervical cancer

T2w

1761

Intensity, shape, texture, filter-based

Quantization method, LoG kernel sizes,

ICC(1,1), ICC(2,1), Pearson correlation, Krippendorff’s alpha

Test-retest repeatability, cross-scanner reproducibility, inter-observer reproducibility

Peerlings et al. [33], 2019

Ovarian, lung and colorectal liver metastasis cancer

DWI (ADC map)

1322

Intensity, shape, texture, filter-based

Center and vendor

CCC

Feature stability

Buch et al. [52], 2018

Nonanatomic Gd-DTPA phantom

T1w

41

Intensity, texture, filter-based (Laws)

Magnet strength, flip-angle, number of excitations, scanner platform

Q values

Feature variability

Yang et al. [53], 2018

Simulated data from digital phantom and glioma

T1w, T2w

26

Texture

Noise level, acceleration factor, and image reconstruction algorithm

Student’s t-test, CV

Feature variance

Bologna et al. [32], 2018

Soft tissue sarcoma and oropharyngeal cancer

DWI (ADC map)

69

Intensity, texture

ROI transformation and bin number

Absolute percentage variation, two-way mixed effect ICC

Feature stability and discrimination

Chirra et al. [40], 2018

Prostate cancer

T2w

406

Intensity, texture, filter-based

Different sites

Multivariate CV and Instability Score

Cross-site reproducibility

Saha et al. [31], 2018

Breast cancer

DCE-MRI (first postcontrast, PE, SER, washing rate maps)

529

Intensity, shape, texture

Scanner, contrast agent

ICC(3,1), Pearson correlation, average DSC

Inter-reader stability, inter-relations within feature groups, pairwise reader variability

Molina et al. [27], 2017

Glioblastoma

T1w

16

Texture

Spatial resolution and bin number

CV

Feature variation

Brynolfsson et al. [54], 2017

Glioma and prostate cancer

DWI (ADC map)

19

Texture

noise level, resolution, ADC map construction, quantization method, and bin number

Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests

Feature distribution variation

Gourtsoyianni et al. [41], 2017

Primary rectal cancer

T2w

46

Intensity, texture, filter-based

2 baseline examinations

wCV

Test-retest repeatability

Guan et al. [55], 2016

Cervical cancer

DWI (ADC map)

8

Intensity, texture

GLCM direction

ICC, Wilcoxon test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and ROC curve

Inter- and intra-observer agreement

Molina et al. [56], 2016

Glioblastoma

T1w

16

Texture

Matrix size and bin number

CV

Feature variation

Savio et al. [57], 2010

Multiple sclerosis

T1w

264

Intensity, texture, filter-based

Global, regional and local features

Wilcoxon’s signed ranks test

Feature variation

Mayerhoefer et al. [58], 2009

PSAG phantom

T2w

NA

Texture, filter-based

Spatial resolution, NAs, TR, TE, and SBW

LDA and k-NN classifier

Ability to distinguish between different patterns

Collewet et al. [59], 2004

Cheese phantom

T2w, PDW

90

Texture, filter-based

MRI acquisition protocol and quantization method

POE, ACC, 1-NN classifier

Classification

  1. MR Magnetic resonance, FLAIR Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, DWI Diffusion-weighted imaging, ADC Apparent diffusion coefficient, DISCO Differential subsampling with cartesian ordering, DCE-MRI Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, PE Peak enhancement, SER Signal enhancement ratio, PDW Proton density weighted, LoG Laplacian of Gaussian, NAs Number of acquisitions, TR Repetition time, TE Echo time, SBW Sampling bandwidth, CCC Concordance correlation coefficient, DR Dynamic range, ICC Intraclass correlation coefficient, wCV Within-subject coefficient of variation, ROC Receiver operating characteristic, CV Coefficient of variation, DSC Dice similarity coefficients, LDA Linear discriminant analysis, k-NN k nearest neighbor, POE Probability of error, ACC Average correlation coefficient, 1-NN 1-nearest neighbor